Showing posts with label sports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sports. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Sportsianity III, a conclusion


Like no other pastime in American culture, sports takes the front seat in defining the American mindset.  The competitive spirit reigns in our homes, places of worship, politics, workplaces and institutions of learning.  What is the 'competitive spirit'? According to Greek mythology;
the name of a goddess: Eris ( ris ). The usual translation of this word is strife. And she is, Hesiod tells us, the daughter of Night, hateful strife that gave birth to painful toil. . . famine and fearful sorrow, fighting, battle, murder, slaughter, quarrels, lies, disputes, lawlessness and ruin. . . . (226-232) [1]
And later on in Greek mythology;
But in a later poem, the Works and Days, which deals with the life of the small farmer, Hesiod has second thoughts; he revises his mythology. There was, after all, he says, another daughter of Night, the elder one; she too is called Eris, and Zeus himself has set her in the roots of the earth: She is much kinder to men. She stirs up even the shiftless men to work, for any man grows eager to work when he sees his neighbor, a rich man who is keen to plough and sow and put his house in order; neighbor vies with neighbor in the race for wealth. This Eris is good for men. And potter competes with potter, craftsman with craftsman; beggar is jealous of beggar and bard of bard. (19-26)[1]
The good and the bad competition (Eris) idea still pervades our culture today in sport and war.  The Greeks were not unique in this worldview but certainly the most historically complete.  In contrast to this worldview, Jesus taught a radically different response to man's natural desire to dominate their sphere of influence through some form of conflict.  Demonstrating that servitude by washing the feet of His disciples and ultimately  allowing His crucifixion.  And how can we forget the imperative from Zechariah 4:6 "Not by might, nor by power, but by My Spirit, says Jehovah of Hosts."

Christianity, or more specifically Biblical Christianity, turns on it's ear normal human reaction to stress or challenge.  It teaches us a strength through faith rather than by self reliance.

Muscular Christianity teaches that men in particular "were not truly Christians unless they were healthy and 'manly' (a term used to connote strength, endurance and other stereotypically male attributes)."[2]
Scripture cited for it's justification were Mark 11:15 where Jesus cast out the money changers and 1 Corinthians 6:19-20, it's context fornication, not body building.  Both interpretations a stretch of the context to say the least.  And Jesus is no longer portrayed as in the scripture found in Isaiah 53:3 as a man of sorrows and rejected and despised but "...a Christ who they {men} could respect... one who was 'no gentle visionary', but rather, 'a Person whose dominating trait is force."[2]
Naturally, if one believes Jesus was a 'mans man' muscular, handsome, the outdoors type and would love to play a game of backyard football with His buddies, then He wouldn't be so 'despicable' or 'rejectable' after all.  This was and is the Jesus of the muscular Christianity movement.

It's genesis was in the late 1800's where familiar organizations were born such as the YMCA and the Rough Riders of Teddy Roosevelt, until just after the first World War when those men that spent their tour of duty in the bloodbath saw this form of Christianity for what it really was, brought home a disillusionment of a church that endorsed a so called 'holy warfare'.  That disillusionment spread throughout society marking the beginning of a return to what was called neo-orthodoxy.  The church tried to return to it's roots but trust in it's leaders, who fell under the spell of modernity and social relevancy, was lost.  The church was no longer the leader in defining the nature of our society.  Sports was no longer a means to get in manly shape for service to God but became once again a religion in it's own rite.  But, muscular Christianity was not totally dead, but moved to the backwaters of independent churches until the 1950's with the resurgence of fundamentalist evangelicalism in preachers such as Billy Graham, where sports were reintroduced as a godly endeavor.  The competitor's creed of competing for the pleasure of God flies in the face of His own words to love your neighbors.  It's Orwellian logic to say by beating my opponent I am loving him.  But this logic is prevalent in our pulpits, most all of them.  It truly is 'another gospel'.  No wonder we raise one confused generation after another with this kind of doctrine that teaches on the one hand to turn the other cheek and then in our gymnasiums attached to our sanctuaries we tell them to win by hitting the hardest.  Would our society admire our finest Christian men and women if they were losers in their beloved sports?  I think not.  Then, we are shocked and dismayed when this competitive spirit shows up in our missions board or other committees and arguments break out, relationships are damaged sometimes beyond repair, churches split over who has control of the pastor.

I think it's time for the church to reassess it's primary role and that of sports in our society.  And Christ-likeness to be measured from Biblical norms, not the imagination of overly zealous social gospelers.  Don't you?

Addendum:  I'll be adding sources that refute the theology of sports in Christian doctrine from time to time here.
 Psalm 147:10-11  He delighteth not in the strength of the horse: he taketh not pleasure in the legs of a man. The LORD taketh pleasure in them that fear him, in those that hope in his mercy.

Notes:[ ]
  1. Always To Be Best: The Competitive Spirit in Ancient Greek Culture Dr. Bernard Knox,The Professor John C. Rouman Classical Lecture Series  At the University of New Hampshire, Durham, October 13, 1999 - PDF
Muscular Christianity: Manhood and Sports in Protestant America, 1880-1920, Clifford Putne

    Update: 9-26-10 from New Your Times article regarding Bishop Eddie L. Long

    "He also adopted what has become known as “muscular Christianity,” a male-dominated view that emphasizes a warriorlike man who serves as the spiritual authority and protector in a family. His books on relationships suggest that men get in touch with their inner “wild man” and channel their fighting instincts into taking responsibility for their lives."

    Sunday, January 31, 2010

    Sportsianity II

    I have slowed my posting schedule in order to devote more time in finishing Clifford Putney's work Muscular Christianity.  True to my past experiences with the providential hand of God on my life and interests, this source has proved invaluable.  Hopefully, I will be able to contribute to the understanding of the battle that exists between Christians of different cultural backgrounds and find the common ground in the scriptures.

    Sports, as I have discovered once promoted as a means to invigorate the underused bodies of Christian men in the last century, has now become a secular religion in it's own rite.  Bearing all the trappings of ancient pagan religions who's view and use of the human body in worship of multiple deities resulted in the Games that destroyed the same for pleasure.

    I will show some gross misinterpretation of scripture that opened the door to countless tragic social injustices within the church, elevating outward appearance over the inward man that we are still to this day paying the price for.  Shocking as it may be to some, there will be no competition in the Kingdom of God.

    Monday, January 25, 2010

    Sportsianity and the Church

    Now this is going to be controversial to some, but I would like to examine the role of sports in our evangelical churches today.  We can all admit that the competitive mindset has overtaken our Christian culture for as long as anyone of us alive can remember and we've all had some negative or positive experiences with it in our lives so it is important to discuss.
    I picked the title to pique interest and hopefully promote some dialog.  The term "Sportsianity" has been used before but doesn't seem very popular yet whereas "muscular Christianity" (Wiki) has historical roots from the 19th and 20th century..  It's a derogatory word describing the melding of competitive sports and Christian beliefs, hence 'Christian Athletes'.  Secular authors have had their say on the subject and it's time for us to examine ourselves in this matter.  Some viewpoints here and here.  The Fellowship of Christian Athletes webfca.com has its own creed and I'll reproduce it here for discussion.

    I am a Christian first and last.
    I am created in the likeness of 
    God Almighty to bring Him glory.
    I am a member of Team Jesus Christ.
    I wear the colors of the cross.

    I am a Competitor now and forever.
    I am made to strive, to strain,
    to stretch and to succeed
    in the arena of competition.
    I am a Christian Competitor
    and as such, I face my challenger
    with the face of Christ.

    I do not trust in myself.
    I do not boast in my abilities
    or believe in my own strength.
    I rely solely on the power of God.
    I compete for the pleasure of
    my Heavenly Father, the honor of Christ
    and the reputation of the Holy Spirit.

    My attitude on and off
    the field is above reproach -
    my conduct beyond criticism.
    Whether I am preparing,
    practicing or playing;
    I submit to God's authority
    and those He has put over me.
    I respect my coaches, officials,
    teammates and competitors
    out of respect for the Lord.

    My body is the temple of Jesus Christ.
    I protect it from within and without.
    Nothing enters my body that
    does not honor the Living God.
    My sweat is an offering to my Master.
    My soreness is a sacrifice to my Savior.

    I give my all - all of the time.
    I do not give up. I do not give in.
    I do not give out. I am the Lord’s warrior -
    a competitor by conviction
    and a disciple of determination.
    I am confident beyond reason
    because my confidence lies in Christ.
    The results of my efforts
    must result in His glory.

    Source: fca.com

     This creed is emblematic of the general viewpoint that sports are inherently Christian in nature and to be promoted at every level in the church and Christian societies.  But this wasn't always true.  The early Roman church for example was the victim of their society's lust for sports and entertainment.  There was also a period between the 1920s and 50s where the Protestant Evangelicals sought to distance themselves from the sports mindset.

    It is apparent that this is a vast subject and is not easily treated in a short essay.  There is already some discussion at the academic level and there seems to be a growing awareness that 'something has gone awry' with our wholesale acceptance of the competitive spirit in our sanctuaries.  Methodism historically was against allowing sports into church activities when it was introducing the 'holiness movement'.  Now, we as a church and secular society meet in our living rooms on Super Sunday in similar fashion rooting for our team.  The refreshments may be different, but the spirit is the same.
    The theology of 'Hyper muscular Christianity' found in some of Mark Driscoll's teaching including a statement "Jesus is a pride fighter with a tattoo down His leg, a sword in His hand, and the willingness to make someone bleed.  That is a guy I can worship...I cannot worship a guy I can beat up." is a natural progression to the philosophy of physical dominance found in most of our churches today that effectively teaches "Only those with strong bodies are good Christians."  or  "Only the strong will inherit the Kingdom of God."  Of course, anyone with a minimum of Biblical understanding knows the scripture teaches much the opposite.
    Being 'strong in the Lord' may look like being a total loser to the world, and often does.

    Muscular Christianity: Manhood and Sports in Protestant America, 1880-1920